This category assesses the clarity and coherence of the abstract, including the articulation of the problem, objectives, methods, and anticipated results. A high score reflects a well-organized and easy-to-understand abstract.

This category evaluates the level of originality in the research project. It considers the uniqueness of the research question and the innovative aspects of the study.

A score of 1 suggests a lack of rigor in the proposed methodology, whereas a score of 10 indicates a well-considered and robust research plan with appropriate study design and analytical methods.

This category examines the thoroughness and clarity in interpreting research results. It assesses how well the findings are presented and their implications for the research question.

This category evaluates how well the research project aligns with the practice of medicine. It considers the practical applications of the project in real-world medical settings and its potential contributions to improved patient care practices.

A score of 1 indicates poor clarity and organization, with difficulty understanding the abstract. A score of 10 reflects an excellent presentation, demonstrating clear articulation of the problem, objectives, methods, and anticipated results.

A score of 1 suggests little to no innovation or impact, while a score of 10 signifies a highly innovative project with the potential for significant positive outcomes for patients and healthcare systems.

This category assesses the feasibility and practicality of the proposed QIPS project, considering the likelihood of successful implementation based on available resources, time constraints, and the practicality of the proposed interventions. Additionally, it evaluates the adaptability of the project to changes and unforeseen circumstances.

A score of 1 suggests a lack of rigor in the proposed methodology, whereas a score of 10 indicates a well-considered and robust research plan with appropriate study design and analytical methods.

A score of 1 reflects little relevance to the practice of medicine, while a score of 10 indicates strong alignment with real-world medical settings and potential contributions to improved patient care practices.